Christians in Australia: Who do you vote for?

There is no perfect political party, as we are still dealing with fallible men, we are not yet under the perfect & just rule of our Lord & Saviour, who will establish His rule soon on earth.

In the meanwhile we still have a task to do. How are you or will you be voting? If you are voting for any other party than One Nation, than you are not making the best choice. Even some of the more "conservative" parties, senators & MP's have mostly also turned against Israel.

Standing Firm on Israel: Pauline Hanson’s Rising Influence in Australia

Pauline Hanson, leader of One Nation, has consistently positioned herself and her party as a clear and vocal supporter of both the Jewish community in Australia and the State of Israel. Her public statements, parliamentary actions, and policy positions have repeatedly centred on themes of security, opposition to antisemitism, and unwavering alignment with Israel.

In public commentary, Hanson has emphasised the right of Jewish Australians to live free from fear and discrimination. She has stated: “I stand with Australia’s Jewish community… you have the same right to live in peace and harmony as all Australians.” She has also spoken directly about safety concerns, saying: “I am standing up for the Jewish people in this country… I fear for the Jewish people.” These remarks are not abstract, they speak to real and growing concerns, and they are delivered with a level of clarity that cuts through.

At a policy level, Hanson has backed formal recognition of antisemitism, including support for parliamentary motions referencing the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition. This reflects a willingness to move beyond rhetoric and support practical frameworks aimed at identifying and addressing antisemitic conduct.

A defining moment came in May 2024, when Hanson wore an Israeli-flag scarf in the Senate as a visible act of solidarity. The scarf was ruled “unparliamentary” and she was asked to remove it. Hanson made it clear this was deliberate - she was “standing up for the Jewish people” and calling attention to what she described as rising antisemitism and inconsistency in how political symbols are treated in parliament. For many observers, this was not just symbolism, it was a statement of intent.

Beyond that moment, Hanson has maintained a consistent and unapologetic alignment with Israel, including criticism of Australian governments when she believes they have failed to show sufficient support. She has stated it is “quite evident” when leadership “does not support the Israel people.” That consistency, over time, has reinforced her position as a predictable and reliable voice on these issues.

At the same time, her broader political message is gaining traction. Recent polling in early 2026 has shown One Nation polling strongly, in some cases above 20%, with certain surveys indicating even higher peaks. This marks a significant shift from historical levels and reflects a growing appetite among voters for clearer, more direct political messaging. The party’s support is not isolated, with gains evident across multiple states, including Victoria, Queensland, and South Australia. In the 2026 South Australian election, One Nation translated this momentum into tangible results, securing seats and recording vote shares exceeding 20%.

From my perspective as a Jewish Australian, Hanson’s voice clearly resonates. At a time when concerns about antisemitism are increasingly front of mind, her willingness to speak plainly, act visibly, and maintain a consistent position carries weight. It is not just what she says, but the fact that she continues to say it, without ambiguity or retreat, that stands out.

Taken together, Hanson’s statements, policy positions, and actions, including the Israeli scarf incident, reflect a sustained emphasis on security for Jewish Australians, recognition of rising antisemitism, and support for Israel. From my perspective, that clarity and consistency make her a compelling and credible voice on issues that directly impact the Jewish community.

We didn’t vote them in.

Let’s stop pretending we did.

When a party forms government with around 34% of the primary vote, that is not a clear mandate. That means two-thirds of Australians did not choose them as their first preference.

They didn’t win because most Australians wanted them. They won because the system shuffled preferences until someone was left standing.

That might be legal, but don’t insult people’s intelligence by calling it consent. Australians are told, “You voted for this.”

No, we didn’t.

What we’re watching now isn’t representation, it’s procedure. A system where power is handed to a minority and then defended with technicalities. A system where parliament increasingly feels less like the voice of the people and more like a very expensive buy, swap, and sell marketplace.

Votes traded for deals.

Support exchanged for amendments. Backroom agreements while everyday Australians are locked out of the conversation.

And once they’re in power, they govern like they have a blank cheque, pushing through laws, limiting debate, and acting shocked when trust collapses.

Democracy isn’t just about ticking a box on election day. It’s about legitimacy. It’s about consent.

It’s about the majority actually having a say.

When governments rule with a third of the vote and silence dissent through procedure, people are right to question whether the system is working for them anymore.

So no, don’t say “we voted them in.”

We didn’t.

And the more they ignore that reality, the more Australians will stop believing this system represents them at all.

BREAKING: THREE ISIS brides arrested for slavery on arrival in Melbourne and Sydney as four women + nine children (13 total) touched down this afternoon.

AFP Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt just confirmed at a special press conference.

The charges are damning:

• Kawsar Abbas and daughter Zahra Ahmad (Melbourne): enslavement, possessing a slave, using a slave, and engaging in slave trading.

• Janai Safar (Sydney): entering a declared terror area and membership of a terrorist organisation.

These women chose the ISIS caliphate.

They married its savage fighters, raised children under the black flag, and allegedly lived in households where Yazidi women and girls were bought, sold, raped and owned as “spoils of war.” Yazidi survivors gave evidence of being held as personal slaves by their husbands.

This is medieval Islamist barbarism, supremacist, violent, and totally incompatible with Australia.

Albo lied when he said “if you make your bed, you lie in it” and promised no help for their return.

Now they’re here.

Tony Burke, whose Watson electorate is full of Muslim voters in Lakemba, has overseen the whole thing while Labor chases those votes.

What’s worse is three of the children are already teenagers, brainwashed from birth to hate us and fight for the same death cult.

This is national betrayal and cultural suicide.

Enough is enough.

Shut down radical mosques.

Arrest those who support fundamental Islam.

Deport non-citizens involved.

Ban Muslim immigration.

Australia must choose: our values or their barbarism.

The rage is justified.

We must act now before it’s too late.

First, they came for your wallet.

Now they're coming for your freedom.

Right now, a Bill is moving through the Australian Parliament that should terrify every freedom-loving Aussie. It's called the ASIO Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025.

It already passed the House of Representatives. The Senate is about to vote on it.

What does it do?

 Makes ASIO's "extraordinary" coercive questioning powers PERMANENT — removing the sunset clause that's existed since 2003.

 Lets ASIO compel Australians, including children as young as 14, to answer questions under threat of penalty.

 Expands the grounds for these warrants to include vague new categories like "promotion of communal violence," which is language so loose it could mean almost anything a future government decides it means.

 Strips away the requirement for Parliament to review these powers every three years.

The Law Council of Australia OPPOSES this Bill. They warned Parliament these powers "were never intended to be made permanent."

Liberal Senator Alex Antic warned: "This Bill doesn't just extend extraordinary powers, it makes them permanent. Every Australian who values freedom under the law should be paying attention."

But here's the part that should shake you to the core:

Back in 2003, when these exact same powers were first introduced, one Labor MP stood up in Parliament and said this:

"Its provisions potentially allow for the mistreatment of ethnic minorities, the suppression of dissent, and the detaining and investigation of wholly innocent Australians."

That MP's name? Anthony Albanese. The same Anthony Albanese who is now making those powers PERMANENT.

He warned us about these powers. Then he became Prime Minister. And now he's locking them in forever.

This is who he is. This is what they all do. They campaign as defenders of freedom, then they hand the security state a blank cheque the moment they get the keys.

 Cost of living crushing your family.

 Mass migration changing the country without your consent.

 And now... permanent secret-police powers being waved through with bipartisan support, while Australians are too exhausted to notice.

We don't have to wait until 2028 to get rid of this government. We can act now.

We are demanding the dissolution of Parliament and an immediate federal election. NOW.

Before this Bill becomes permanent law. Before the next "misinformation" push. Before there's nothing left to vote for.

 Sign the petition: AlboMustGo.com

 Share this before more Australians wake up too late

 Comment "ENOUGH" if you remember when Australia was free

Albanese warned us about these powers in 2003.

In 2026, he's the one bringing them down on your head