top of page
Search

All it takes is an accusation!

crossroadscaloundr
1 day ago
4 min read

Updated: 20 hours ago

I am so sick of this society, with it's double standards towards those who are not woke, left, feminist, Muslim, illegal immigrants , LGTBQ etc. But if you are a hard working tax paying citizen, a white male, a farmer, a Christian or Jewish, a small business owner, a family man, against killing precious little human beings in the womb ( and that is what they are) you get "the book thrown at you" so to speak. As a Christian Pastor I am of course looking forward to the blessed hope, but as long as I am here on earth I will fight back with all that is within me, against all this hypocrisy, anarchy loving, baby killing, Muslim death cult, Palestinian Flag Waving useful idiots! Maybe some of you think a pastor shouldn't talk like this, well than you probably are not familiar with some of things John the Baptist, the Apostle Paul & the Lord Jesus himself said against hypocrites, mine are mild compared to that.

The word "hypocrite" comes from the ancient Greek word ὑποκριτής (hypokritēs), which literally means "an actor" or "a stage player".

Etymology and Breakdown:

• hypo-: A prefix meaning "under".

• krites / krinomai: Root related to judging, answering, or interpreting (krino meaning to separate or judge).

• Literal translation: "An interpreter from underneath" or someone who answers from beneath a mask.

Origins of the word idiot:

/ˈɪdiət/

The word idiot comes from the Ancient Greek word idiōtēs (ἰδιώτης), which means a "private person," "layman," or someone without professional or public standing. This Greek root itself stems from idios (ἴδios), meaning "one's own" or "private".

Historical Evolution

• Ancient Greece: An idiōtēs simply referred to a citizen who was a private individual—someone who did not hold public office, serve as a professional, or actively engage in the political life of the polis (city-state). While early Greek society viewed active public participation as a high civic duty, the term initially denoted a private or ordinary person rather than a foolish one.

• Latin and Old French: The word passed into Latin as idiōta (meaning an uneducated person, ignoramus, or layman) and later into Old French as idiote.

• 14th-Century English: English borrowed the word by the 14th century, where it initially meant an uneducated person or, in early English common law, a person born with severe intellectual deficiencies or lacking the capacity to reason from birth (distinguished legally from a "lunatic," who experienced periodic insanity).

• Medical and Modern Usage: By the 19th and early 20th centuries, "idiot" became a formal technical and clinical term in psychology and medicine to classify the lowest level of intellectual disability (traditionally defined by a mental age under three or four, or an IQ below 30). That clinical usage is now obsolete and considered offensive, leaving the modern informal definition as an insult for a foolish or senseless person.

She doesn't have to know him. She may never have met him. Rape. Abuse. He's arrested, his face is online, and his life is over before a judge hears a word.

Innocent until proven guilty? Only on paper.

The person who lied?

Almost nothing happens to her. Try proving defamation. Try getting your name back. The laws protect the accuser, not the accused.

I've watched this in every state, families, churches, courtrooms and statehouses for years.

They ALL know it's happening.

My take, they don't fix it the broken system because the broken parts is what pays them the most: attorneys, experts, the courts themselves.

Meanwhile men take their own lives at four times the rate of women, about 80% of all suicides, a pattern this country has seen for over 100 years!

Who's at risk?

Grandfathers. Dads. Husbands. Sons. Nephews. Every man alive.

So who should be concerned?

Every single one of us.

It's been said for years men don't speak because of their toxic masculinity.

Men speak all the time, no one hears them.

Masculinity has been demonized by a toxic society that's directly responsible for its decline.

Men have always been disposable. We fight the wars other people make, we will be the first to go down with the ship to keep other people safe.

We don't tell the world our problems because the world will use those problems we confide to belittle us.

Be honest, even if we wanted to, where do we have that would listen to us anyway?

A country that profits off of war needs disposable men to fight the war.

A system or court that profits from false allegations needs him just as much.

If that wasn't bad enough, once they strip him of everything and can't get anymore, they dispose of him and go for the most important thing in our lives:

Ours sons, and that's how the cycle continues.....

Russell Brand was convicted of rape and sexual assault and sentenced to more than 10 years in prison.

Here's what concerns me about this case.

- ZERO confirmed independent eyewitnesses** who actually saw the crimes for which he was convicted.

- ZERO reported forensic evidence** establishing that the assaults occurred.

- ZERO reported video evidence** showing the alleged crimes.

- Allegations dating back many years.

- Convictions based heavily on the accusers' testimony, supported by text messages and other circumstantial evidence.

Testimony is legally admissible evidence. But testimony isn't automatically proof that something happened.

History is filled with wrongful convictions based on eyewitness accounts. People have spent decades in prison, only to be exonerated when DNA evidence proved those witnesses were wrong.

What someone believes happened and what can be independently verified are two very different things.

That's why corroborating evidence matters.

In Brand's case, the jury convicted him on four charges and acquitted him on three.

But the fundamental question remains:

What independent evidence established that these crimes actually occurred?

When someone's freedom is at stake, we should demand the highest standard of proof.

Beyond a reasonable doubt.

Not beyond a reasonable accusation.


 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page